svn and mercurial
2010-08-29 02:50На страничке http://hgbook.red-bean.com/read/how-did-we-get-here.html есть такой абзац:
Prior to version 1.5, Subversion had no useful support for merges. At the time of writing, its merge tracking capability is new, and known to be complicated and buggy.
А к этому абзацу есть вот такие вот комментарии:
Ben Collins-Sussman 2009-09-08
fuck you bastard
fulatoro 2009-09-16
FYI this is not a disinterested commenter, as a matter of fact he is one of the original developers of SVN...
helloworld 2009-10-06
It's easy to write someone else's name...
Ben Collins-Sussman 2009-12-02
Ha, love the fact that people are impersonating me now. :-)
I actually wrote the section of the svnbook which the 'complicated and buggy' link points to, and I totally agree with the phrase. I'm a dedicated mercurial user these days.
Во втором случае Ben Collins-Sussman вроде бы настоящий.
Prior to version 1.5, Subversion had no useful support for merges. At the time of writing, its merge tracking capability is new, and known to be complicated and buggy.
А к этому абзацу есть вот такие вот комментарии:
Ben Collins-Sussman 2009-09-08
fuck you bastard
fulatoro 2009-09-16
FYI this is not a disinterested commenter, as a matter of fact he is one of the original developers of SVN...
helloworld 2009-10-06
It's easy to write someone else's name...
Ben Collins-Sussman 2009-12-02
Ha, love the fact that people are impersonating me now. :-)
I actually wrote the section of the svnbook which the 'complicated and buggy' link points to, and I totally agree with the phrase. I'm a dedicated mercurial user these days.
Во втором случае Ben Collins-Sussman вроде бы настоящий.